Start With the Draft, Not the Category
Credit-card content is not the issue; the retrieved policies describe no blanket prohibition. The issue is a sentence promising an outcome the publisher cannot deliver.
Picture a draft headed “Guaranteed approval,” “no credit check,” or “free cash bonus.” Each phrase needs a control test: who decides the outcome, who supplies the product, and can the publisher verify the promise for every reader? If the answer depends on an issuer, an affiliate, or nobody, the wording is exposed.
Separately, Google’s US and Canada rules bar personalizing credit-product ads by gender, age, parental status, marital status, or ZIP code; negative financial-status signals are also sensitive. That is a targeting rule, not a content ban.
The Claim Patterns Google Treats as Egregious
Google’s strike table separates ordinary and egregious violations: five ordinary violations equal one strike; one egregious violation equals one strike. A single overstated sentence can carry more weight than several smaller defects.
- “Promising loans.” The policy names this directly. In card content, an approval guarantee has the same structure: the publisher promises a decision made by an issuer.
- Specific promises outside your control. The policy illustration is an account-opening claim ending “with no credit check.” A publisher can report an issuer’s stated criteria, but cannot guarantee a reader will open an account or avoid a check.
- “Free or cash offers”; unreasonably cheap offers. An impossible price is illustrated by a brand-new vehicle for $1000. The defect is the unconditional promise, not whether a few readers might qualify.
- Misrepresentation of identity. Claiming to provide something you do not provide is egregious; the example is “We’re hiring drivers today!” on a site that is not a hiring agency. A card page posing as the issuer or an official program raises the same concern.
- Milder, ordinary versions. Vague or unclear promises, or “specific information” offered but not delivered, belong in the ordinary tier. They still accumulate toward a strike.
A Scan-and-Check Table for the Draft
Run each claim against its policy category. The category tells the writer what to fix; the strike weight shows the consequence.
| Wording pattern documented in Google’s strike guidance | Policy category it falls under | Strike weight per the retrieved table |
|---|
| “Promising loans” | Concrete, explicitly stated promise that cannot be fulfilled | Egregious: 1 violation = 1 strike |
| Specific promise outside the publisher’s control (policy illustration: account opening “with no credit check”) | Promise outside your control | Egregious: 1 violation = 1 strike |
| “Free or cash offers”; unreasonably cheap offers (illustration: brand-new vehicle for $1000) | Concrete, explicitly stated impossible-to-fulfill promise | Egregious: 1 violation = 1 strike |
| Claiming to provide something you do not provide, e.g. “We’re hiring today” when not a hiring agency | Misrepresentation of identity | Egregious: 1 violation = 1 strike |
| Vague or unclear promises; “specific information” offered but not delivered | Ordinary (non-egregious) violation | Ordinary: 5 violations = 1 strike |
Control is the useful distinction. An egregious claim promises a result the publisher cannot deliver; an ordinary claim is weaker but still unsupported. Remove the first rather than soften it.
Rewriting the Claim with a Verification-First Rule
Replace the promise with three checkable facts: who issues the product, what the reader must qualify for, and where the terms come from.
For approval, write: “The issuer decides eligibility; review its current terms before applying.” Avoid “You will be approved,” “everyone qualifies,” or “guaranteed.” For “no credit check,” distinguish a product without a credit check from a claim that approval is assured. If the issuer’s terms do not support the statement, omit it.
For a bonus or cash claim, name the source and conditions: “The issuer’s published terms describe a bonus after qualifying purchases.” Avoid free money or automatic language. For price statements, use the issuer’s disclosed terms rather than an inference from a marketing email. The retrieved packet contains no APRs, fees, bonus amounts, or approval criteria, so this article does not supply them; source those details independently.
The rewrite test is not “true for someone,” but “verifiable for every reader who sees the ad or page.” A result dependent on an issuer’s decision fails. Vague wording such as “the right card for you” is still unsupported.
The Traffic-Source Trap on Credit-Card Pages
The claim can fail away from the article body. Google’s traffic-source policy requires sources to be relevant to and accurately describe the destination page. A source must not promise products, services, or promotions that are absent, or hard to find, on the landing page. Publishers are responsible for all sources, including affiliates and networks.
A familiar version: a paid ad or affiliate placement says “exclusive bonus inside,” but the landing page has no matching offer, buries the terms, or links to a different product. The creative and page become evidence against each other. Make the headline’s object match the page’s object, and make the offer findable where the reader lands.
On AdSense for Search, ads may appear only on search results pages driven by explicit user search intent, and ads should not outnumber organic results returned for the query. One-offer pages are not a substitute for a genuine search-results experience.
Pre-Publish Check and Evidence Limits
Use this order:
- Inventory claims in headlines, body copy, tables, and affiliate creatives.
- Apply the control test: an issuer-controlled outcome cannot be promised.
- Match traffic sources and creatives to the landing page; remove absent or buried offers.
- On AdSense for Search pages, confirm explicit query intent and keep ads below organic-result count.
- Re-check the live English policy pages before publication.
Limits matter. The retrieved policy text is a Chinese-language compilation, so official English wording may differ. Google may revise policies at any time and enforcement is discretionary; no timelines or outcomes are guaranteed. No APR, fee, bonus amount, or approval criterion is stated here; product data was not retrieved. This is policy reading, not legal, financial, or tax advice; regulated offer pages should go through qualified counsel or compliance review.
研究の知恵